projector: compare to tvs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to tvs 1.00
compare to physical tvs 0.98
compare to tvs nowadays 0.97
compare to physical tvs nowadays 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(projector, compare to tvs)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to physical tvs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(projector, compare to physical tvs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(projector, compare to physical tvs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to physical tvs nowadays)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(projector, compare to physical tvs nowadays)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(projector, compare to physical tvs nowadays)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to tvs nowadays)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(projector, compare to tvs nowadays)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(projector, compare to physical tvs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(projector, compare to tvs nowadays)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(projector, compare to physical tvs nowadays)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(projector, compare to tvs nowadays)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(projector, compare to tvs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(projector, compare to tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(projector, compare to tvs)