projector: has trait resolution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has trait resolution 1.00
have resolution 0.90
have low resolution 0.88
is low resolution 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(projector, has trait resolution)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(projector, have resolution)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(projector, have resolution)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(projector, have low resolution)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(projector, is low resolution)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(projector, have resolution)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(projector, have low resolution)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(projector, is low resolution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(projector, have low resolution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(projector, is low resolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(projector, is low resolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(projector, have low resolution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(projector, have resolution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(projector, has trait resolution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(projector, has trait resolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(projector, has trait resolution)