projector: is overhead expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is overhead expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.79
overhead use convex lens 0.78
get expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(projector, is overhead expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(projector, is overhead expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(digital camera, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(projector, is overhead expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(projector, overhead use convex lens)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(projector, overhead use convex lens)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(projector, overhead use convex lens)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(projector, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(projector, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(projector, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(projector, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(projector, overhead use convex lens)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(projector, is overhead expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(projector, is overhead expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(digital camera, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(projector, is overhead expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)