projector: overhead use convex lens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
overhead use convex lens 1.00
have convex lens 0.95
use convex lenses 0.93
is overhead expensive 0.78
see infrared 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(movie projector, have convex lens)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, see infrared)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(movie projector, have convex lens)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(movie projector, have convex lens)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(digital camera, see infrared)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(digital camera, see infrared)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(projector, overhead use convex lens)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(projector, use convex lenses)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(projector, use convex lenses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(projector, use convex lenses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(projector, is overhead expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(projector, use convex lenses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(projector, is overhead expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(projector, is overhead expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(projector, is overhead expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(projector, overhead use convex lens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(projector, overhead use convex lens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(movie projector, have convex lens)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(projector, overhead use convex lens)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, see infrared)