projector: show movie

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, laptop
Weight: 0.36
, webcam
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
show movie 1.00
show film 0.96
be at movie 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(movie projector, be at movie)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(movie projector, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(movie projector, be at movie)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(projector, show movie)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(projector, be at movie)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(projector, be at movie)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(projector, show film)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(projector, show film)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(projector, show film)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(projector, be at movie)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(projector, show film)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(projector, be at movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(projector, show movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(projector, show movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(projector, show movie)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(movie projector, be at movie)