projector: use convex lenses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use convex lenses 1.00
have convex lens 0.96
overhead use convex lens 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(movie projector, have convex lens)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(movie projector, have convex lens)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(movie projector, have convex lens)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(projector, use convex lenses)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(projector, overhead use convex lens)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(projector, overhead use convex lens)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(projector, overhead use convex lens)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(projector, overhead use convex lens)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(projector, use convex lenses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(projector, use convex lenses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(projector, use convex lenses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(movie projector, have convex lens)