prong: have holes in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents act
Weight: 0.48
, band
Weight: 0.46
, setting
Weight: 0.40
, element
Weight: 0.38
Siblings plan b
Weight: 0.30
, defendant
Weight: 0.30
, sonic youth
Weight: 0.28
, coercion
Weight: 0.28
, supremes
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
have holes in them 1.00
has physical part holes 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prong, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(prong, have holes in them)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prong, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(prong, has physical part holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(prong, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(prong, has physical part holes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(prong, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(prong, has physical part holes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(prong, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prong, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(prong, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(prong, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(prong, have holes in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prong, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(prong, have holes in them)