proportion: be important in architecture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents study
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, amount
Weight: 0.59
Siblings length
Weight: 0.60
, golden ratio
Weight: 0.58
, quantity
Weight: 0.33
, consequence
Weight: 0.33
, incidence
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in architecture 1.00
be important in design 0.85
be important in art 0.77
be important in geometry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(element, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(element, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(element, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in design)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(element, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be important in design)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(proportion, be important in architecture)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(proportion, be important in design)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(proportion, be important in design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in geometry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in art)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(proportion, be important in geometry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(proportion, be important in geometry)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(proportion, be important in art)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(proportion, be important in art)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in geometry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in design)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(element, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be important in design)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be important in art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(element, be important in art)