proportion: be important in geometry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents study
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, amount
Weight: 0.59
Siblings length
Weight: 0.60
, golden ratio
Weight: 0.58
, quantity
Weight: 0.33
, consequence
Weight: 0.33
, incidence
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in geometry 1.00
be important in design 0.78
be important in architecture 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in design)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be important in design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(proportion, be important in geometry)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in architecture)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in design)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in architecture)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in design)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(proportion, be important in design)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(proportion, be important in architecture)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(proportion, be important in design)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(proportion, be important in architecture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in geometry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(proportion, be important in geometry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be important in geometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be important in design)