proposal: has state surprise

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amendment
Weight: 0.75
, legislation
Weight: 0.70
, recommendation
Weight: 0.67
, policy
Weight: 0.66
, resolution
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.74
, plan
Weight: 0.71
, cap
Weight: 0.62
, decision
Weight: 0.36
, provision
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state surprise 1.00
have surprise 0.97
is surprise 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(proposal, has state surprise)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(proposal, have surprise)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(proposal, is surprise)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(proposal, have surprise)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(proposal, is surprise)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(proposal, have surprise)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(proposal, is surprise)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is surprise)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(proposal, have surprise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(proposal, has state surprise)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(proposal, has state surprise)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(proposal, has state surprise)