prosecutor: drop charges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.67
, attorney
Weight: 0.62
, defendant
Weight: 0.60
, police officer
Weight: 0.57
, actor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lawyer
Weight: 0.35
, investigator
Weight: 0.35
, state police
Weight: 0.34
, police
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
drop charges 1.00
drop cases 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(attorney, drop cases)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(prosecutor, drop charges)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(attorney, drop cases)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(attorney, drop cases)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(attorney, drop cases)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, drop charges)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(prosecutor, drop charges)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(prosecutor, drop cases)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, drop cases)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, drop cases)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(prosecutor, drop cases)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, drop charges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(prosecutor, drop charges)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(attorney, drop cases)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(prosecutor, drop charges)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(attorney, drop cases)