prostate gland: is enlarged

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gland
Weight: 0.71
, tissue
Weight: 0.69
, organ
Weight: 0.63
, male reproductive system
Weight: 0.57
, pelvis
Weight: 0.54
Siblings salivary gland
Weight: 0.42
, pineal gland
Weight: 0.42
, adrenal gland
Weight: 0.42
, sebaceous gland
Weight: 0.41
, mammary gland
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is enlarged 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(prostate gland, is enlarged)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pelvis, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(prostate gland, is enlarged)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pelvis, is enlarged)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gland, is enlarged)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(gland, is enlarged)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, is enlarged)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(prostate gland, is enlarged)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pelvis, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(prostate gland, is enlarged)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(prostate gland, is enlarged)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(prostate gland, is enlarged)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(prostate gland, is enlarged)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pelvis, is enlarged)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(gland, is enlarged)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pelvis, is enlarged)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(prostate gland, is enlarged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(gland, is enlarged)