protocol: be important in network communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ssl
Weight: 0.67
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.63
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, ip
Weight: 0.59
, rip
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in network communication 1.00
be needed in network 0.87
be in data communication 0.86
be necessary for networks 0.84
be needed in networks 0.84
be necessary in computer networks 0.83
be in computer networks 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(protocol, be important in network communication)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(protocol, be in data communication)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(protocol, be in data communication)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(protocol, be in data communication)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(protocol, be necessary for networks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(protocol, be needed in network)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(protocol, be in computer networks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(protocol, be in computer networks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(protocol, be needed in network)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(protocol, be necessary for networks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(protocol, be needed in networks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(protocol, be necessary for networks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(protocol, be in computer networks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(protocol, be needed in networks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(protocol, be needed in network)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(protocol, be needed in networks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be in computer networks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be needed in network)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be necessary in computer networks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be needed in networks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be in data communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be necessary for networks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(protocol, be important in network communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(protocol, be important in network communication)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(protocol, be important in network communication)