province: has physical part region

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.67
, region
Weight: 0.61
, country
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ontario
Weight: 0.66
, free state
Weight: 0.65
, alberta
Weight: 0.65
, quebec
Weight: 0.61
, first nation
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part region 1.00
be based on regions 0.76
be based on ethno-linguistic regions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(province, has physical part region)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(province, be based on regions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(province, be based on regions)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(province, be based on regions)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(province, be based on regions)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(province, be based on ethno-linguistic regions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(province, has physical part region)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(province, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(province, has physical part region)