provision: be on national territory significant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amendment
Weight: 0.77
, section
Weight: 0.62
, limitation
Weight: 0.62
, clause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.74
, measure
Weight: 0.70
, legislation
Weight: 0.70
, resolution
Weight: 0.65
, modification
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on national territory significant 1.00
be on territory significant 0.96
be on national territory 0.96
be on national territory significant in constitution 0.92
be on territory 0.90
be on territory significant in constitution 0.89
is significant 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(amendment, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(amendment, is significant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is significant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(amendment, is significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(provision, be on national territory significant)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(provision, be on territory)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(provision, be on territory)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(provision, be on national territory)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(provision, be on territory significant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(provision, be on territory)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(provision, be on territory significant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(amendment, is significant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(provision, be on national territory significant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(amendment, is significant)