provision: be on territory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amendment
Weight: 0.77
, section
Weight: 0.62
, limitation
Weight: 0.62
, clause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.74
, measure
Weight: 0.70
, legislation
Weight: 0.70
, resolution
Weight: 0.65
, modification
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on territory 1.00
be on national territory 0.95
be on territory significant 0.94
be on national territory significant 0.90
be on territory significant in constitution 0.85
be on national territory significant in constitution 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(provision, be on territory)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(provision, be on national territory)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(provision, be on territory significant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(provision, be on territory significant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(provision, be on national territory significant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(provision, be on territory)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(provision, be on territory)