provision: be on territory significant

Related concepts

Parents	amendment Weight: 0.77 , section Weight: 0.62 , limitation Weight: 0.62 , clause Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bill Weight: 0.74 , measure Weight: 0.70 , legislation Weight: 0.70 , resolution Weight: 0.65 , modification Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be on territory significant	1.00
be on national territory significant	0.96
be on territory	0.94
be on national territory	0.90
be on territory significant in constitution	0.89
be on national territory significant in constitution	0.87
is significant	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(amendment, is significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(amendment, is significant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(amendment, is significant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(amendment, is significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(provision, be on territory significant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(provision, be on territory significant)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(provision, be on territory)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(provision, be on territory)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(provision, be on territory)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(provision, be on national territory)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(provision, be on national territory significant)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(provision, be on territory significant in constitution)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(provision, be on national territory significant in constitution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(provision, be on territory significant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(amendment, is significant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(provision, be on territory significant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(amendment, is significant)