provision: were recognizing community property rights included

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amendment
Weight: 0.77
, section
Weight: 0.62
, limitation
Weight: 0.62
, clause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.74
, measure
Weight: 0.70
, legislation
Weight: 0.70
, resolution
Weight: 0.65
, modification
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
were recognizing community property rights included 1.00
were recognizing community property rights 0.98
were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution 0.93
preserve individual rights 0.80
preserve rights 0.77
be in first bill of rights 0.75
be in bill of rights 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(amendment, preserve individual rights)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(amendment, be in first bill of rights)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(amendment, preserve rights)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(amendment, be in bill of rights)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(amendment, preserve individual rights)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(amendment, be in bill of rights)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(amendment, preserve rights)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(amendment, be in first bill of rights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(amendment, preserve individual rights)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(amendment, be in first bill of rights)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(amendment, preserve rights)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(amendment, be in bill of rights)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(amendment, preserve individual rights)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(amendment, be in first bill of rights)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(amendment, preserve rights)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(amendment, be in bill of rights)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(provision, were recognizing community property rights)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(provision, be in bill of rights)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(provision, be in bill of rights)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(provision, be in bill of rights)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included in texas constitution)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(provision, be in bill of rights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(amendment, be in bill of rights)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve rights)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(amendment, be in first bill of rights)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve individual rights)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve individual rights)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(amendment, preserve rights)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(amendment, be in bill of rights)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(provision, were recognizing community property rights included)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(amendment, be in first bill of rights)