psychologist: be interested in development of taste aversions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents counselor
Weight: 0.70
, doctor
Weight: 0.68
, specialist
Weight: 0.68
, researcher
Weight: 0.61
, expert
Weight: 0.57
Siblings jean piaget
Weight: 0.57
, psychiatrist
Weight: 0.38
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.37
, author
Weight: 0.36
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be interested in development of taste aversions 1.00
see taste as adaptive 0.76
be skeptical about extrasensory perception 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(psychologist, see taste as adaptive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(psychologist, see taste as adaptive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(psychologist, see taste as adaptive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(psychologist, be skeptical about extrasensory perception)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(psychologist, be skeptical about extrasensory perception)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(psychologist, be skeptical about extrasensory perception)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(psychologist, be skeptical about extrasensory perception)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(psychologist, see taste as adaptive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(psychologist, be interested in development of taste aversions)