ptc: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.44
, thing
Weight: 0.42
, system
Weight: 0.39
, company
Weight: 0.39
, site
Weight: 0.38
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.26
, living thing
Weight: 0.26
, remember
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality better 0.90
has quality news 0.80
has quality full 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ptc, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ptc, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ptc, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ptc, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ptc, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ptc, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(ptc, has quality news)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ptc, has quality news)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ptc, has quality full)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ptc, has quality news)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ptc, has quality full)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ptc, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ptc, has quality full)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ptc, has quality full)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ptc, has quality news)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ptc, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ptc, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ptc, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)