public school: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school district
Weight: 0.83
, university
Weight: 0.70
, public servant
Weight: 0.66
, building
Weight: 0.66
, place
Weight: 0.66
Siblings winchester
Weight: 0.51
, elementary school
Weight: 0.39
, high school
Weight: 0.39
, secondary school
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is poor 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(university, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(public school, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(public school, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(school district, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(public school, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(school district, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(building, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(university, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(school district, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(university, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(winchester, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(university, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(school district, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(high school, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(winchester, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(winchester, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(winchester, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(winchester, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(public school, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(public school, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(public school, has quality better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(public school, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(public school, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(public school, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(public school, is poor)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(public school, is poor)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(public school, is poor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(public school, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(public school, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(university, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(school district, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(winchester, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(winchester, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(university, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(public school, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(school district, has quality good)