public speaking: is distinct phenomenon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.68
, subject
Weight: 0.67
, course
Weight: 0.63
, function
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings speaking
Weight: 0.37
, talking
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.33
, forum
Weight: 0.33
, talk show
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is distinct phenomenon 1.00
is phenomenon 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(speaking, is phenomenon)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(speaking, is distinct phenomenon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(speaking, is distinct phenomenon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(speaking, is phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(speaking, is phenomenon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(public speaking, is phenomenon)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(public speaking, is phenomenon)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(public speaking, is phenomenon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(public speaking, is phenomenon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(speaking, is distinct phenomenon)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(public speaking, is distinct phenomenon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speaking, is phenomenon)