public transport: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
be better for environment 0.93
help environment 0.87
be bad in bulgaria 0.82
has quality bad 0.80
be bad in us 0.80
be in bad weather 0.79
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mrt, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mrt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mrt, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(air travel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(air travel, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air travel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(air travel, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(public transport, help environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(public transport, help environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(public transport, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(public transport, help environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(public transport, be better for environment)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(public transport, help environment)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(public transport, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(air travel, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mrt, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air travel, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(public transport, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)