public transport: be bad in us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in us 1.00
be important to us 0.91
be bad in bulgaria 0.89
be expensive in us 0.87
be in sport important to us 0.83
is terrible 0.80
has quality bad 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
be in bad weather 0.79
learn bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(project, be important to us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in sport important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(air travel, is terrible)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in us)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(air travel, be expensive in us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air travel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(air travel, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(air travel, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(air travel, is terrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in us)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(public transport, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(air travel, be expensive in us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(air travel, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(air travel, is terrible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)