public transport: be better driving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better driving 1.00
be safer than car travel 0.79
be better than cars 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be safer than car travel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(air travel, be safer than car travel)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(air travel, be safer than car travel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(public transport, be better driving)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than cars)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(public transport, be better than cars)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better driving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(public transport, be better driving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better driving)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(air travel, be safer than car travel)