public transport: be better for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.93
help environment 0.90
be better than public 0.80
be better than transport 0.79
be more expensive for less now 0.76
is more important 0.76
be more effective than sector 0.76
is more environmentally friendly 0.76
be better than private transport 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(public transport, be better for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(public transport, help environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(public transport, help environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(public transport, help environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(public transport, help environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(public transport, is more environmentally friendly)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(public transport, be better than transport)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(public transport, is more environmentally friendly)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than transport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than transport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(public transport, is more environmentally friendly)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, is more environmentally friendly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)