public transport: be better than cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than cars 1.00
be cars 0.89
be safer than car travel 0.85
be better than public 0.83
be better than transport 0.81
be more expensive for less now 0.80
be more expensive for less 0.80
be better than private transport 0.79
be better driving 0.79
get worse 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than cars)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(project, be cars)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than cars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(project, be cars)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(project, be cars)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be safer than car travel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(air travel, get worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(project, be cars)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(air travel, be safer than car travel)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(air travel, be safer than car travel)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(air travel, get worse)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(air travel, get worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(public transport, be better than cars)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(public transport, be better driving)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better driving)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(public transport, be better than transport)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than transport)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than transport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better driving)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than private transport)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(public transport, be better driving)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(project, be cars)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(air travel, be safer than car travel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(air travel, get worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(project, be cars)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)