public transport: be better than transport

Related concepts

Parents	service Weight: 0.71 , sector Weight: 0.71 , project Weight: 0.65 , issue Weight: 0.64 , facility Weight: 0.64
Siblings	bus stop Weight: 0.67 , air travel Weight: 0.66 , mrt Weight: 0.47 , postal service Weight: 0.37 , escort service Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be better than transport	1.00
be better than private transport	0.94
be better than public	0.82
be cheaper than rail	0.82
be better than cars	0.81
be safer than car travel	0.80
be better for environment	0.79
be more effective than sector	0.78
be more effective than public sector	0.78
be more expensive for less now	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(public transport, be better than transport)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(public transport, be better than transport)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(public transport, be better than transport)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than sector)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(air travel, be cheaper than rail)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(air travel, be safer than car travel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than transport)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(sector, be more effective than sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than transport)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than transport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(air travel, be cheaper than rail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(air travel, be cheaper than rail)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

Remarkable(air travel, be safer than car travel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(air travel, be safer than car travel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(public transport, be better than transport)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(public transport, be better than private transport)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than private transport)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than private transport)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(public transport, be better than cars)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(public transport, be better for environment)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(public transport, be better than private transport)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(public transport, be better than cars)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(public transport, be better than transport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(air travel, be safer than car travel)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(air travel, be cheaper than rail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(public transport, be better than transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than sector)