public transport: be expensive in sydney

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in sydney 1.00
be in london expensive 0.82
be expensive in london 0.82
be bad in australia 0.79
be in uk expensive 0.79
be expensive in uk 0.79
be in australia 0.78
be in london 0.78
be expensive in india 0.78
be in canada expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(service, be in london)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(issue, be in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in australia)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(air travel, be in canada expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(air travel, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(air travel, be expensive in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(public transport, be expensive in sydney)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(public transport, be in london)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in uk expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in uk)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(public transport, be in uk expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(public transport, be in uk expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in london)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in uk expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(public transport, be expensive in uk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(public transport, be expensive in uk)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(public transport, be in london)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in canada expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air travel, be expensive in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)