public transport: be in boston

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in boston 1.00
be in nyc 0.83
be in seattle 0.81
be in chicago 0.81
be in london 0.79
be in london expensive 0.78
be expensive in london 0.78
is england 0.77
be bad in france 0.76
be in europe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be in boston)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be in boston)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sector, is england)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be in boston)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sector, is england)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(service, be in london)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in france)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sector, is england)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in europe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sector, is england)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in boston)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(air travel, be in europe)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in europe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(public transport, be in boston)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(public transport, be in seattle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in seattle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(public transport, be in seattle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in seattle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(public transport, be in london)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(public transport, be in london)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in london)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be in boston)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sector, is england)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in europe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sector, is england)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(public transport, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)