public transport: contribute to energy saving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to energy saving 1.00
impact use of renewable energy 0.80
impact use of energy 0.80
need cost 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(public transport, contribute to energy saving)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(issue, impact use of energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(public transport, contribute to energy saving)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use of energy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use of renewable energy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use of energy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(public transport, contribute to energy saving)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(issue, impact use of energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(public transport, contribute to energy saving)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(public transport, contribute to energy saving)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(public transport, contribute to energy saving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(public transport, contribute to energy saving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of energy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of energy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(public transport, contribute to energy saving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)