public transport: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.71
, sector
Weight: 0.71
, project
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bus stop
Weight: 0.67
, air travel
Weight: 0.66
, mrt
Weight: 0.47
, postal service
Weight: 0.37
, escort service
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality news 0.79
be bad in bulgaria 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
be bad in us 0.76
be better for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(air travel, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mrt, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mrt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mrt, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(air travel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(air travel, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(air travel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(air travel, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(air travel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air travel, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(public transport, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(public transport, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(public transport, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(public transport, be bad in us)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(public transport, be better for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(public transport, be bad in us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(public transport, be bad in us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be bad in us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(public transport, be better for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(public transport, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air travel, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mrt, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(air travel, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air travel, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(public transport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)