:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, is good pets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pug, is good pets)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make pets)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pug, make pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pug, make pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pug, make pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(pug, is dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(pug, is dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pug, is dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pug, make pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pug, is good pet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pug, is dogs)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(pug, is good pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)