pug: look sad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.71
, small dog
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, puppy
Weight: 0.63
, breed
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
look sad 1.00
look amazing 0.80
have weird eyes 0.77
is weird 0.77
is funny 0.75
look amazing in ridiculous outfits 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beagle, look sad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, look sad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(beagle, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(beagle, look sad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pug, look sad)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pug, is funny)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pug, is funny)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pug, is funny)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pug, is funny)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pug, look sad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pug, look sad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, look sad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pug, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beagle, look sad)