pulley: has quality questions

Related concepts

Parents	equipment Weight: 0.54 , part Weight: 0.53 , mechanism Weight: 0.51 , wheel Weight: 0.51
Siblings	alternator Weight: 0.53 , conveyor belt Weight: 0.33 , ventilation system Weight: 0.33 , elevator shaft Weight: 0.32 , crane Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality questions	1.00
questions	0.92
has quality better	0.76
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(pulley, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(crane, has quality questions)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(pulley, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(crane, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(crane, has quality questions)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(pulley, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(pulley, questions)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(pulley, questions)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(pulley, questions)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(pulley, questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(pulley, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(crane, has quality questions)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(alternator, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(pulley, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)