pulmonary edema: be vs pleural effusion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.75
, condition
Weight: 0.70
, disease
Weight: 0.68
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, lung
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pulmonary embolism
Weight: 0.40
, myocardial infarction
Weight: 0.39
, edema
Weight: 0.39
, pleural effusion
Weight: 0.39
, pneumothorax
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs pleural effusion 1.00
be vs effusion 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(edema, be vs pleural effusion)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(edema, be vs effusion)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(edema, be vs pleural effusion)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(edema, be vs effusion)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(edema, be vs effusion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, be vs effusion)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(pulmonary edema, be vs effusion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, be vs effusion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, be vs effusion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(edema, be vs effusion)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, be vs pleural effusion)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(edema, be vs pleural effusion)