pulp: were important in northern canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fiber
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
, industry
Weight: 0.57
, fruit
Weight: 0.57
, chemical
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.38
, lumber
Weight: 0.34
, wood
Weight: 0.33
, ethylene glycol
Weight: 0.33
, sugar
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important in northern canada 1.00
were important in northern canada in 1900s 1.00
were important in canada in 1900s 0.93
were important in canada 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pulp, were important in northern canada)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pulp, were important in northern canada in 1900s)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pulp, were important in northern canada in 1900s)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pulp, were important in northern canada in 1900s)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pulp, were important in canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pulp, were important in canada in 1900s)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pulp, were important in canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pulp, were important in canada in 1900s)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pulp, were important in canada)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pulp, were important in canada in 1900s)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pulp, were important in northern canada in 1900s)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pulp, were important in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pulp, were important in canada in 1900s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pulp, were important in northern canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pulp, were important in northern canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pulp, were important in northern canada)