pumpkin: be in dog food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, vegetable
Weight: 0.64
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.63
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.56
, apple pie
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.37
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37
, zucchini
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in dog food 1.00
be for dogs 0.90
be good for dogs 0.87
be bad for dogs 0.87
get food 0.84
help dog diarrhea 0.83
be good for cats 0.82
be good for dogs with diarrhea 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(zucchini, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(zucchini, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(zucchini, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pumpkin, be in dog food)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(pumpkin, be good for cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(pumpkin, be good for cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(pumpkin, be good for cats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pumpkin, get food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pumpkin, be bad for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pumpkin, be good for cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pumpkin, be good for dogs with diarrhea)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pumpkin, be good for dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(pumpkin, be good for dogs with diarrhea)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pumpkin, get food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pumpkin, get food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pumpkin, be good for dogs with diarrhea)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(pumpkin, get food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pumpkin, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pumpkin, be good for dogs with diarrhea)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pumpkin, be good for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pumpkin, be bad for dogs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pumpkin, be good for dogs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pumpkin, be bad for dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pumpkin, be good for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pumpkin, be in dog food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pumpkin, be in dog food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pumpkin, be in dog food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(zucchini, be bad for dogs)