pun: be vs play

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, joke
Weight: 0.50
, form
Weight: 0.48
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.35
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, shit
Weight: 0.33
, lyric
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs play 1.00
be vs entendre 0.96
be vs play on words 0.93
be vs double entendre 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pun, be vs play)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(pun, be vs entendre)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pun, be vs play on words)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pun, be vs entendre)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pun, be vs double entendre)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(pun, be vs entendre)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs entendre)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pun, be vs play on words)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs double entendre)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pun, be vs double entendre)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pun, be vs double entendre)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pun, be vs play)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pun, be vs play)