pun: be vs play on words

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, joke
Weight: 0.50
, form
Weight: 0.48
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.35
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, shit
Weight: 0.33
, lyric
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs play on words 1.00
be vs play 0.93
be vs entendre 0.89
be vs double entendre 0.85
is words 0.79
words 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(word, is words)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pun, be vs play on words)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(word, is words)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(word, is words)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(word, is words)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pun, be vs play on words)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs play)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(pun, be vs entendre)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs entendre)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs double entendre)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pun, is words)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pun, words)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(pun, is words)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(pun, words)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pun, be vs entendre)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pun, be vs play)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(pun, be vs entendre)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(pun, words)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(pun, is words)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pun, be vs double entendre)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(pun, is words)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pun, be vs play)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pun, words)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pun, be vs double entendre)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pun, be vs play)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pun, be vs double entendre)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pun, be vs play on words)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(word, is words)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pun, be vs play on words)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(word, is words)