punishment: was brutal in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents penalty
Weight: 0.67
, consequence
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.61
, motive
Weight: 0.60
Siblings capital punishment
Weight: 0.81
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.76
, suspension
Weight: 0.72
, rape
Weight: 0.69
, sentence
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
was brutal in uk 1.00
was brutal during time 0.85
is uk 0.81
were in europe harsh 0.79
were in medieval europe harsh 0.78
was harsh in tudor times 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, is uk)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, is uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(capital punishment, is uk)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, is uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(imprisonment, is uk)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(punishment, was brutal in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(punishment, was brutal during time)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(punishment, was brutal during time)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(punishment, was brutal during time)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(punishment, is uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(punishment, is uk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(punishment, is uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(punishment, was harsh in tudor times)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(punishment, was harsh in tudor times)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(punishment, was harsh in tudor times)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(punishment, is uk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(punishment, was brutal during time)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(punishment, was harsh in tudor times)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(punishment, was brutal in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(punishment, was brutal in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(capital punishment, is uk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(punishment, was brutal in uk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(imprisonment, is uk)