purging: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.57
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, method
Weight: 0.49
, weight
Weight: 0.35
Siblings bulimia
Weight: 0.30
, overeating
Weight: 0.30
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.30
, denial
Weight: 0.30
, destruction
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
feel good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(purging, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(purging, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(eating disorder, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(purging, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(overeating, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bulimia, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(overeating, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bulimia, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(purging, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(purging, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(eating disorder, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(purging, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(bulimia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bulimia, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(overeating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(overeating, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(overeating, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(overeating, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(denial, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bulimia, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bulimia, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(purging, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(purging, feel good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(purging, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(purging, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(purging, feel good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(purging, feel good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(purging, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(purging, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(purging, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(overeating, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bulimia, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(denial, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bulimia, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(overeating, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(purging, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)