pushing: be in pro play

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, behavior
Weight: 0.50
, movement
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings move
Weight: 0.32
, moving
Weight: 0.32
, fighting
Weight: 0.32
, step
Weight: 0.31
, cutting
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in pro play 1.00
be in pro play important 0.98
be in play 0.83
be in play important 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pushing, be in pro play)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pushing, be in pro play important)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pushing, be in pro play important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pushing, be in pro play important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(pushing, be in play)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pushing, be in play)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pushing, be in play important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(pushing, be in play)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pushing, be in play important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pushing, be in play important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pushing, be in pro play important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pushing, be in play)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pushing, be in play important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(pushing, be in pro play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pushing, be in pro play)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pushing, be in pro play)