putter: value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents golf club
Weight: 0.67
, club
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.50
, disc
Weight: 0.50
Siblings golf ball
Weight: 0.37
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.34
, golfer
Weight: 0.33
, football player
Weight: 0.32
, wedge
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
value 1.00
is value 0.99
has quality worth 0.78
has quality price 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(golf club, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(putter, value)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(club, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(putter, value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(club, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality worth)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(club, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(golf club, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(putter, value)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(club, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(putter, value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(putter, value)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(putter, is value)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(putter, is value)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(putter, is value)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(putter, is value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(putter, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(putter, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(putter, has quality price)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(putter, has quality worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(putter, has quality price)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(putter, has quality price)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality price)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(putter, value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(putter, value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(club, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(club, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(putter, value)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality worth)