python: be good for hacking

Related concepts

Parents	snake Weight: 0.76 , constrictor Weight: 0.68 , reptile Weight: 0.61
Siblings	boa constrictor Weight: 0.40 , rattlesnake Weight: 0.37 , boa Weight: 0.37 , alligator Weight: 0.37 , lizard Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good for hacking	1.00
be used for hacking	0.97
be popular for hackers	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(python, be good for hacking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(python, be good for hacking)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(python, be good for hacking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(python, be popular for hackers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(python, be good for hacking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(python, be popular for hackers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(python, be good for hacking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(python, be popular for hackers)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(python, be good for hacking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(python, be popular for hackers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(python, be good for hacking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(python, be good for hacking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(python, be good for hacking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(python, be good for hacking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(python, be good for hacking)