python: be popular for hackers

Related concepts

Parents	snake Weight: 0.76 , constrictor Weight: 0.68 , reptile Weight: 0.61
Siblings	boa constrictor Weight: 0.40 , rattlesnake Weight: 0.37 , boa Weight: 0.37 , alligator Weight: 0.37 , lizard Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be popular for hackers	1.00
be used for hacking	0.83
be good for hacking	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(python, be popular for hackers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(python, be popular for hackers)

Similarity expansion

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(python, be popular for hackers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(python, be good for hacking)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(python, be popular for hackers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(python, be good for hacking)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(python, be popular for hackers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(python, be good for hacking)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(python, be popular for hackers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(python, be good for hacking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(python, be popular for hackers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(python, be popular for hackers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(python, be popular for hackers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(python, be popular for hackers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(python, be popular for hackers)