quark: have flavors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents particle
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, software
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.50
, program
Weight: 0.48
Siblings alpha particle
Weight: 0.36
, neutrino
Weight: 0.36
, beta particle
Weight: 0.35
, photon
Weight: 0.35
, boson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have flavors 1.00
be called flavors 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(particle, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(quark, have flavors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(particle, have flavors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(particle, have flavors)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(particle, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(quark, have flavors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(quark, have flavors)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(quark, be called flavors)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quark, be called flavors)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(quark, be called flavors)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(quark, be called flavors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quark, have flavors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(quark, have flavors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(particle, have flavors)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(quark, have flavors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(particle, have flavors)