quartz: be at gem store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.73
, stone
Weight: 0.68
, crystal
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings tungsten
Weight: 0.37
, iron ore
Weight: 0.36
, sapphire
Weight: 0.36
, granite
Weight: 0.36
, diamond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at gem store 1.00
be at gem field 0.92
be at jewelry store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be at jewelry store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(diamond, be at jewelry store)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(diamond, be at jewelry store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(quartz, be at gem store)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be at gem field)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(quartz, be at gem field)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(quartz, be at gem field)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(quartz, be at gem field)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be at jewelry store)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(quartz, be at jewelry store)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(quartz, be at jewelry store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(quartz, be at jewelry store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be at gem store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(quartz, be at gem store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be at gem store)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(diamond, be at jewelry store)