quartz: be more expensive than granite

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.73
, stone
Weight: 0.68
, crystal
Weight: 0.65
, silicate
Weight: 0.61
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings amethyst
Weight: 0.54
, kaolinite
Weight: 0.46
, calcite
Weight: 0.38
, tourmaline
Weight: 0.38
, biotite
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than granite 1.00
be better than granite 0.96
be more durable than many modern metals 0.78
be more durable than modern metals 0.77
be cheaper than diamond 0.77
be more useful than rocks 0.77
be harder than steel 0.77
be different than quartz 0.77
be harder than glass 0.76
was chosen rather than wood 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mineral, be more useful than rocks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(crystal, be different than quartz)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stone, was chosen rather than wood)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(stone, was chosen rather than wood)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(crystal, be different than quartz)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mineral, be more useful than rocks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(stone, was chosen rather than wood)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be different than quartz)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mineral, be more useful than rocks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(amethyst, be cheaper than diamond)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mineral, be more useful than rocks)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(crystal, be different than quartz)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stone, was chosen rather than wood)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(amethyst, be cheaper than diamond)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(amethyst, be cheaper than diamond)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(quartz, be more expensive than granite)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be better than granite)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(quartz, be better than granite)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(quartz, be better than granite)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(quartz, be harder than glass)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(quartz, be harder than glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be harder than glass)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(quartz, be better than granite)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(quartz, be harder than steel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(quartz, be harder than steel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be harder than steel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quartz, be harder than glass)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(quartz, be harder than steel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(crystal, be different than quartz)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(stone, was chosen rather than wood)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mineral, be more useful than rocks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(amethyst, be cheaper than diamond)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(stone, was chosen rather than wood)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(crystal, be different than quartz)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(quartz, be more expensive than granite)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mineral, be more useful than rocks)