quebec: be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.64
, province
Weight: 0.61
, region
Weight: 0.56
, city
Weight: 0.55
, territory
Weight: 0.54
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.37
, ontario
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.35
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river 1.00
be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawrence river 0.97
be more important than fort duquesne in relation 0.93
be more important than fort duquesne 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawrence river)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawrence river)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawrence river)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawrence river)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(quebec, be more important than fort duquesne in relation to st lawerence river)